This post will be translated asap.
>>599714Anonymous - 2018-03-09 12:37:37 (UTC +1) - 599714
>>599682
True, but then why Snowden? Doesn't make sense. If they gave him the tool, Snowden isn't of value to the NSA other than a trophy. The tech lives outside of him and Q claims that they own CIA at this point (making assumptions). This is unfolding as if Snowden has something that no one else has access to. Snowden has fame for taking files and exposing, not of someone that developed technology that no one else has. Something not adding up.
Which country does he really work for?
Expand your thinking.
Q