Look for ‘Placeholder’ updates @ /PatriotsFight
Indictments, arrests, and DECLAS will force WW coverage.
Leaks, bribery, collusion re: media will force resignations w/ follow up criminal prosecution.
Q
Look for ‘Placeholder’ updates @ /PatriotsFight
Pick a Network – Any Network.
>>5248831Anonymous - 2019-02-18 22:30:37 (UTC +1) - 5248831
>>5248788
>>5248780
>>5248728
Found the camera
>>5248785Anonymous - 2019-02-18 22:28:53 (UTC +1) - 5248785
>>5248728
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI - 2019-02-18 22:23:29 (UTC +1) - 5248631
>>5248193
>>5248213
Anonymous - 2019-02-18 22:04:54 (UTC +1) - 5248193
>>5247957
Look who was there February 2018 (Corinthia Hotel’s FB page)
>>5248019Anonymous - 2019-02-18 21:58:33 (UTC +1) - 5248019
>>5247957
Right next to where the traffic cam pics were taken.
>>5247912Anonymous - 2019-02-18 21:54:53 (UTC +1) - 5247912
>>5247821
They are getting super desperate.
>>5247847Anonymous - 2019-02-18 21:51:49 (UTC +1) - 5247847
>>5247821
This was a great proof.
Anons are MONTHS ahead of the news!
Chatter uptick re: how to effectively prevent cross-talk re: anti-narrative across all social media/online platforms.
https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1097567705933275137
>>5245512Anonymous - 2019-02-18 20:10:18 (UTC +1) - 5245512
DAN COATS OUT [FORCED] (SOON) - Source = Trump friend Chris Ruddy.
This post will be translated asap.
How can an entity known only as 'Q' (face-less, name-less, fame-less, etc.) begin to ask questions on 4ch (now 8ch) and build something of this magnitude?
>>5244054Anonymous - 2019-02-18 18:53:06 (UTC +1) - 5244054
James Woods @RealJamesWoods
If these actions were directed against a sitting Democrat president, this would be a Watergate level story in the national media by now. Was there an attempt by an acting DAG to weaponize the DOJ in a presidential coup d’etàt?
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1097488256848007173
>>5242466Anonymous - 2019-02-18 17:16:09 (UTC +1) - 5242466
Repost [lb]
Bread 6698
>>5242333
>>5242227 [Q]
>https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/02/18/cbss-lara-logan-on-media-bias-unless-you-seek-out-breitbart-you-wont-see-the-other-side/
>It takes courage to speak the TRUTH these days.
CBS’s Lara Logan on Media Bias: ‘Unless You Seek out Breitbart,’ You Won’t See the ‘Other Side’
www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/02/18/cbss-lara-logan-on-media-bias-unless-you-seek-out-breitbart-you-wont-see-the-other-side/
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/feb/18/online-conspiracy-theorists-democracy
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/02/18/cbss-lara-logan-on-media-bias-unless-you-seek-out-breitbart-you-wont-see-the-other-side/
>>5237651Anonymous - 2019-02-18 07:00:22 (UTC +1) - 5237651
Classic deflection - "the dog ate my homework". Evidence of crime is what you need mr FBI, not dislike and bias to open an investigation.
"Former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe says President Trump's own words were among the reasons top officials decided to open a counterintelligence probe and obstruction of justice investigation into him"
https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1097343765390475265
>>5234560Q !!mG7VJxZNCI - 2019-02-18 04:02:02 (UTC +1) - 5234560
Barr to Mueller:
“Bob, show me the evidence and reasoning for why this investigation was started and still ongoing.”
Mueller to Bart:
“With regards to the President we have found no links or ties to any foreign entity etc”
Barr to Mueller:
“Mandate was clear - verify and investigate reports of possible foreign collusion between President & Russia.” “What justification existed to effectively launch a massive domestic / foreign surv campaign against the President (pres elect / president) and members of his transition / campaign team?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Steele dossier along w/ media corroboration of those findings.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was the Steele report a ‘trusted and verified’ report per Intel to continue especially considering the funding party was the opposition party?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Those facts were never taken into consideration.” “FISC granted auth to conduct based on conclusions presented.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was FISC made aware of all details surrounding the dossier?”
Mueller to Barr:
“No.” “We believe there was urgency placed on the auth given the gravity and timeline of events that those involved negated to populate fully.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Why were efforts made to continue investigating the President, interrupt his official capacity in governing, if the only doc presented was unsubstantiated and unverified?” “Why were questions and threat of subpoena communicated to the President if no factual foundation existed?”
“All charges thus far are unrelated to the original mandate - why are you still active and pursuing a crime if no verifiable evidence or evidence through discovery exists?”
Barr to RR:
“What justification did you have to effectively expand the mandate, not report that expansion to Congress, in order to seek a crime outside of R collusion?” “What specific reasoning and/or facts existed to justify the appointment of a SC to begin with per the law?” “Why did you recommend to Sessions that he should recuse?” “Why wasn’t the mandate / budget and regular updates provided to Congress upon request?” “Why is everything kept confidential and under inappropriate classification?” “Was the purpose of investigating to find a crime vs investigate evidence of a crime?”
CLAS 1-99
Q
>>5234560Q !!mG7VJxZNCI - 2019-02-18 04:02:02 (UTC +1) - 5234560
Barr to Mueller:
“Bob, show me the evidence and reasoning for why this investigation was started and still ongoing.”
Mueller to Bart:
“With regards to the President we have found no links or ties to any foreign entity etc”
Barr to Mueller:
“Mandate was clear - verify and investigate reports of possible foreign collusion between President & Russia.” “What justification existed to effectively launch a massive domestic / foreign surv campaign against the President (pres elect / president) and members of his transition / campaign team?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Steele dossier along w/ media corroboration of those findings.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was the Steele report a ‘trusted and verified’ report per Intel to continue especially considering the funding party was the opposition party?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Those facts were never taken into consideration.” “FISC granted auth to conduct based on conclusions presented.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was FISC made aware of all details surrounding the dossier?”
Mueller to Barr:
“No.” “We believe there was urgency placed on the auth given the gravity and timeline of events that those involved negated to populate fully.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Why were efforts made to continue investigating the President, interrupt his official capacity in governing, if the only doc presented was unsubstantiated and unverified?” “Why were questions and threat of subpoena communicated to the President if no factual foundation existed?”
“All charges thus far are unrelated to the original mandate - why are you still active and pursuing a crime if no verifiable evidence or evidence through discovery exists?”
Barr to RR:
“What justification did you have to effectively expand the mandate, not report that expansion to Congress, in order to seek a crime outside of R collusion?” “What specific reasoning and/or facts existed to justify the appointment of a SC to begin with per the law?” “Why did you recommend to Sessions that he should recuse?” “Why wasn’t the mandate / budget and regular updates provided to Congress upon request?” “Why is everything kept confidential and under inappropriate classification?” “Was the purpose of investigating to find a crime vs investigate evidence of a crime?”
CLAS 1-99
Q
Barr to Mueller:
>>5231025Anonymous - 2019-02-18 01:00:43 (UTC +1) - 5231025
3 [0] Deltas today sir
Graphic request.
>>5230665Anonymous - 2019-02-18 00:45:57 (UTC +1) - 5230665
New POTUS Tweet
[1] minute delta
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1097280840156020736
(est)
Anonymous - 2019-02-18 00:32:20 (UTC +1) - 5230378
>>5230278
>time.com/5324130/most-influential-internet/
http://time.com/5324130/most-influential-internet/
How do you infiltrate the MSM?
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI - 2019-02-17 23:04:54 (UTC +1) - 5228903
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cory-booker-withholding-judgment-on-smollett-case-after-calling-it-attempted-modern-day-lynching
Harris & Booker applying political pressure re: Chicago PD re: Smollett FF case?
What Bill did the Senate recently pass re: lynching?
Who were the authors of the Bill?
What FF event took place just prior to the passing of the Bill?
Did the FF event involve a 'noose'?
Did the FF event sway Senators in their decision to prevent FAKE NEWS attacks re: Smollett case?
Did FAKE NEWS contact many Senators prior to vote seeking out pro/nay in attempt to coerce using Smollett case as foundation for possible future smear?
What is the mathematical probability of these [2] events occurring within this same time period?
What is the relationship of Smollett & Booker/Harris?
Will Rahm Emanuel get involved?
Will the Chicago PD cave under pressure?
These people are sick!
#WakeUpAmerica
Q
@Snowden
>>5225833Anonymous - 2019-02-17 20:06:48 (UTC +1) - 5225833
Rocking gif overlay
>>5225562Anonymous - 2019-02-17 19:56:11 (UTC +1) - 5225562
>>5225486
Good stuff
>>5225482Anonymous - 2019-02-17 19:51:51 (UTC +1) - 5225482
2 Q posts
2 POTUS tweets
All within a one minute delta
>>5225342Anonymous - 2019-02-17 19:47:11 (UTC +1) - 5225342
>>5225131
>>5224931
>>5224934
>>5225094
>>5225232
[0] Delta from today, and the last [0] delta.
16 total now!
>>5225271Anonymous - 2019-02-17 19:44:39 (UTC +1) - 5225271
>>5225213
>>5225131Anonymous - 2019-02-17 19:39:41 (UTC +1) - 5225131
>>5224934
>>5224931
2 [0] Deltas guys 2
>>5225105Anonymous - 2019-02-17 19:38:25 (UTC +1) - 5225105
Yet another blattant Q proof:
DOUBLE ZERO DELTA
Trump team is with us today friends!
>>5225094Q !!mG7VJxZNCI - 2019-02-17 19:38:05 (UTC +1) - 5225094
>>5224943
Date posted (early)?
Oct 31 2017
Prior to the black pop awakening?
Why did we emphasize as important?
When you are awake we can see clearly.
Q
Anonymous - 2019-02-17 19:29:31 (UTC +1) - 5224943
>>5224931
black pop waking up?
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI - 2019-02-17 19:28:46 (UTC +1) - 5224931
https://twitter.com/THawk23055136/status/1097194764250673152
It's very simple - w/o the illegal vote D's lose.
Previous illegal imm high pop v D win by county provided.
[Example 2]
Why do D's push for illegals to obtain a driver's license?
Does having a DL make it easier to vote?
http://www.ncsl.org/research/immigration/states-offering-driver-s-licenses-to-immigrants.aspx
What states provide DL's to illegals?
What checks are in place within each of the 'DL granted states' to prevent 2x-3x-4x-5x voting?
Compare v. 2016 Presidential election results.
What do you notice?
Do you believe in coincidences?
Memes are important.
#FactsMatter
Q