QPosts.in

Anonymous - 2019-02-17 08:48:23 (UTC +1) - 5219376

>>5218933 pb Q
These phrases below imply that Trump plans on following his constitutional rights no matter what he signed iin the “Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2019” (the “Act”), which authorizes appropriations to fund the operation of a number of agencies in the Federal Government through September 30, 2019.
“My Administration will treat each of these provisions consistent with the President’s constitutional authorities with respect to foreign relations.”
And
“my Administration will continue the practice of treating provisions like these as advisory and non-binding.”
And
“My Administration will make appropriate efforts to notify the relevant committees before taking the specified actions and will accord the recommendations of such committees all appropriate and serious consideration, but it will not treat spending decisions as dependent on the approval of congressional committees.”

Anonymous - 2019-02-17 08:40:37 (UTC +1) - 5219261

>>5219223
I trust Potus
And I trust the LORD.
The Lord is leading Potus, of that I'm certain.

Anonymous - 2019-02-17 08:35:43 (UTC +1) - 5219185

Trumps statement is brilliant Deep State loaded the bill with multiple facets to block it and his white house statement just released systemically points out section by section where they tried to block him and he's countering that by citing presidential and constitutional authority.

Shall we play a game?

#WWG1WGA #Qanon #PATRIOTS #TheGreatAwakening

Anonymous - 2019-02-17 08:28:12 (UTC +1) - 5219066

>>5218933
>https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/statement-by-the-president-28/

So all restrictions are off?

Anonymous - 2019-02-17 08:21:10 (UTC +1) - 5218953

>>5218735
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.443
Nov 10 2018 12:44:56 (EST)
The 'Scaramucci' Play
Temp hire to remove embedded 'untrustworthy' staffers?
>Spicer
>Priebus
Temps can be very dangerous to those who are targeted.
Think Whitaker.
[NEXT WEEK]

Anonymous - 2019-02-17 06:48:15 (UTC +1) - 5217756

Former top FBI lawyer: 2 Trump cabinet officials were ‘ready to support’ 25th Amendment effort

Former top FBI lawyer James Baker, in closed-door testimony to Congress, detailed alleged discussions among senior officials at the Justice Department about invoking the 25th Amendment to remove President Trump from office, claiming he was told Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said two Trump Cabinet officials were “ready to support” such an effort.

During his testimony, Baker acknowledged he was not directly involved in the May 2017 discussions but testified over a two-day period in October that McCabe and Page came to him contemporaneously after meeting with Rosenstein for input in the days after Comey was fired by the president.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/former-top-fbi-lawyer-2-trump-cabinet-officials-were-ready-to-support-25th-amendment-effort

DIG ANONS!!!!!
TWO CABINET MEMBERS IN ~ MAY OF 2017 WE FUCKING TRAITORS

Anonymous - 2019-02-16 20:58:13 (UTC +1) - 5208844

>>5208800
https://twitter.com/DevinNunes/status/1091108124700766208

Anonymous - 2019-02-15 16:12:40 (UTC +1) - 5188784

>>5188720
2653
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
6 Jan 2019 - 12:32:35 PM
[RBG]
Why was she 'selected'?
Who appointed her?
Remember [her] history.
Ref: 230-page book called Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, published in 1977 by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
Highlights:
>Called for the sex-integration of prisons and reformatories so that conditions of imprisonment, security and housing could be equal. She explained, “If the grand design of such institutions is to prepare inmates for return to the community as persons equipped to benefit from and contribute to civil society, then perpetuation of single-sex institutions should be rejected.” (Page 101)
>Called for the sex-integration of Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts because they “perpetuate stereotyped sex roles.” (Page 145)
>Insisted on sex-integrating “college fraternity and sorority chapters” and replacing them with “college social societies.” (Page 169)
>Cast constitutional doubt on the legality of “Mother’s Day and Father’s Day as separate holidays.” (Page 146)
>Called for reducing the age of consent for sexual acts to people who are “less than 12 years old.” (Page 102)
>Asserted that laws against “bigamists, persons cohabiting with more than one woman, and women cohabiting with a bigamist” are unconstitutional. (Page 195)
>Objected to laws against prostitution because “prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions.” (Page 97)
>Ginsburg wrote that the Mann Act (which punishes those who engage in interstate sex traffic of women and girls) is “offensive.” Such acts should be considered “within the zone of privacy.” (Page 98)
>Demanded that we “firmly reject draft or combat exemption for women,” stating “women must be subject to the draft if men are.” But, she added, “the need for affirmative action and for transition measures is particularly strong in the uniformed services.” (Page 218)
>An indefatigable censor, Ginsburg listed hundreds of “sexist” words that must be eliminated from all statutes. Among words she found offensive were: man, woman, manmade, mankind, husband, wife, mother, father, sister, brother, son, daughter, serviceman, longshoreman, postmaster, watchman, seamanship, and “to man” (a vessel). (Pages 15-16)
>Wanted he, she, him, her, his, and hers to be dropped down the memory hole. They must be replaced by he/she, her/him, and hers/his, and federal statutes must use the bad grammar of “plural constructions to avoid third person singular pronouns.” (Page 52-53)
>Condemned the Supreme Court’s ruling in Harris v. McRae and claimed that taxpayer-funded abortions should be a constitutional right.
http://humanevents.com/2005/08/23/senators-overlooked-radical-record-of-ruth-bader-ginsburg/📁
Who are the doctors 'currently' treating [RBG]?
What other political [former/current] sr. political heads are they affiliated w/?
What 'off-market' drugs are being provided to [RBG] in order to sustain minimum daily function?
What is the real medical diagnosis of [RBG]?
Who is managing her care?
Who is 'really' managing her care?
The clock is ticking.
PANIC IN DC.
Q

Anonymous - 2019-02-15 15:19:09 (UTC +1) - 5187870

>>5187857
YES…the F15 plane pic Q posted.
feb 15th

Anonymous - 2019-02-15 12:10:39 (UTC +1) - 5186193

>>5186098
Wife of burned, amputee Veteran here..we are ready, we are with you… we will continue to fight. God speed Q+++

Anonymous - 2019-02-15 11:32:48 (UTC +1) - 5185721

>>5185619
>https://video.foxnews.com/v/6002418364001/#sp=show-clips
>DOJ held meetings on how to oust President Trump

>Why, hours after the election, did seven people travel to an undisclosed location to hold a very private & highly secured/guarded meeting?

ANONs knew it beforehand.

Anonymous - 2019-02-15 11:18:59 (UTC +1) - 5185578

>>5185527 (lb)
I dont think anyone is surprised, got to be the bottom of the pit to harm another human being the way they do. Hang 'em high.

This post will be translated asap.

Anonymous - 2019-02-15 01:39:36 (UTC +1) - 5177926

>>5177902
>https://mobile.twitter.com/NormieWokeAF/status/1096206390295699456

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI - 2019-02-15 00:52:34 (UTC +1) - 5176841

>>5176626
Plus important encore, pourquoi est-ce que le WASH POST mène l'attaque contre ‘Q’?
Qui est le propriétaire du WASH POST?
Qui finance Amazon?
Qui a visé la NSA en réf à: divulguer/empêcher SURV pré U1 / IRAN?
Pourquoi sommes-nous attaqués tous les jours par les plus grandes agences de presse du monde?
Faites preuve de prudence - Ciblage d'un nombre important de suiveurs pour diriger la foule "empêtrée dans la narration" comme méthode d'élimination.
Q

Anonymous - 2019-02-15 00:43:57 (UTC +1) - 5176626

>>5176617
Is Sather talking to WaPo a good thing??

Anonymous - 2019-02-15 00:25:44 (UTC +1) - 5176247

>>5176118
Got eyes on someone in china early today? Thanks Q for all you and your people are doing to unite our world!! We owe you more than you know

Anonymous - 2019-02-15 00:20:18 (UTC +1) - 5176128

>>5176118
>#WinningBigly
and how

Anonymous - 2019-02-14 11:41:27 (UTC +1) - 5167220

Séquence terminée.
Cible(s) connue.
Suivez 7B-DS
Q

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI - 2019-02-12 17:51:34 (UTC +1) - 5141350

>>5141323
Faute d'orthographe par erreur.
En mouvement
Q

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI - 2019-02-12 17:50:48 (UTC +1) - 5141323

>>5141276
C'est Mathématiquement impossible.
Ceux qui challenge cet aspect ont un agenda ou sont simplement endormis.
La NARRATION OFFICIELLE les tient.
Q

Anonymous - 2019-02-12 17:49:34 (UTC +1) - 5141276

>>5141109
>We are past that now, correct?

>Q

Way past this now. People who still need proofs will never get it