タイムラインをつけてあるよ
その後、何が起きた?
未来が過去を証明する(トラック&アップデート)
カレンダーを考えて
Q

This post will be translated asap.

Pick a Network – Any Network.
Search ‘Qanon’
https://www.nbcnews.com/pages/search/?q=qanon
https://abcnews.go.com/search?searchtext=qanon
https://www.washingtonpost.com/newssearch/?datefilter=All%20Since%202005&query=qanon&sort=Relevance&utm_term=.d3e179a0682e
https://www.nytimes.com/search?query=qanon
https://www.cnn.com/search/?q=qanon
http://www.msnbc.com/search/qanon
https://www.newsweek.com/search/site/qanon
http://fortune.com/search/?q=qanon
https://www.wired.com/search/?q=qanon&page=1&sort=score
https://www.theguardian.com/us (search: Qanon)
https://www.npr.org/search?query=qanon&page=1
https://www.vox.com/search?q=qanon
https://www.gq.com/search?q=qanon
https://www.pbs.org/search/?q=qanon
https://www.theverge.com/search?q=qanon
https://observer.com/?s=qanon
https://www.aljazeera.com/Search/?q=qanon
https://www.foxnews.com/search-results/search?q=qanon
https://www.breitbart.com/search/?s=qanon#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=qanon&gsc.page=1
https://psmag.com/search?query=qanon
https://www.newyorker.com/search/q/qanon
https://www.latimes.com/search/?q=qanon
https://www.seattletimes.com/search/?query=qanon&sortby=mostrecent&page=1&perpage=20
https://www.esquire.com/search/?q=qanon
https://www.thesun.co.uk/?s=qanon
https://www.bbc.co.uk/search?q=qanon
https://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/Muslim-woman-fights-for-Israel-despite-death-threats-watch-581066#/search;query=qanon
https://qz.com/search/qanon/
http://nymag.com/search.html?q=qanon
https://www.politico.com/search?q=qanon
https://thehill.com/search/site/qanon
https://search.huffingtonpost.com/search?utf8=✓&p=qanon&fr=huffpost
http://time.com/search/?q=qanon
https://www.vice.com/en_us/search?q=qanon
https://www.salon.com/search/qanon
https://www.dailydot.com/?s=qanon
https://www.miaminewtimes.com/search?keyword=qanon
https://www.rollingstone.com/results/#?q=qanon
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/search?q=qanon
https://www.snopes.com/?s=qanon
https://www.buzzfeed.com/search?q=qanon
https://www.mediamatters.org/search/index?qstring=qanon
http://thefederalist.com/?s=qanon
Reconcile.
Q

This post will be translated asap.

Anonymous - 2019-02-18 22:30:37 (UTC +1) - 5248831

>>5248788
>>5248780
>>5248728


Found the camera
>>5248831

This post will be translated asap.

Anonymous - 2019-02-18 22:28:53 (UTC +1) - 5248785

>>5248728
>>5248785
Always 0 results.
What does that tell you?
Q

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI - 2019-02-18 22:23:29 (UTC +1) - 5248631

>>5248193
>>5248213
>>5248631

This post will be translated asap.

Anonymous - 2019-02-18 22:04:54 (UTC +1) - 5248193

>>5247957
Look who was there February 2018 (Corinthia Hotel’s FB page)
>>5248193
>>5248213

This post will be translated asap.

Anonymous - 2019-02-18 21:58:33 (UTC +1) - 5248019

>>5247957
Right next to where the traffic cam pics were taken.
>>5248019

Anonymous - 2019-02-18 21:54:53 (UTC +1) - 5247912

>>5247821

They are getting super desperate.
>>5247912
https://www.newsguardtech.com
ああ、ヤツら死ぬほど必死なんだよ
Q

Anonymous - 2019-02-18 21:51:49 (UTC +1) - 5247847

>>5247821
This was a great proof.
Anons are MONTHS ahead of the news!
>>5247847
コリンシアホテル
Q

すべてのソーシャルメディア/オンライン・プラットフォームにわたる 
ウソ話に抗う '真実の拡散' を効果的に防止する方法についての 噂が広まっている
真実の拡散を防止するには 大衆にリリースされるものを 
より詳細にコントロールできるフェイクニュースだけを通信にする
一連のシナリオが現在実施されている
['システムの策略']反応 リスク 計算結果をテストする
プロフィール 履歴 コメントの 'キーワード・ターゲティングに
よる' 挿入された暗号の層に検閲[追加]+ 個々のプラットフォームの
改造をしたが 問題を縮小できなかった
特定のプラットフォーム(メンテナンス中)の '中国-ロシア-イラン'
の 'フェイク' ハッキング攻撃は ゲームプレイされている1つのシナリオである
[ゼロ- 日]
対策中
[例]
緊急警報システムを 考えて
ホワイトハウスがコントロールする *新しい* リアルタイムの 'ニュース'
ウェブサイトを 考えて
ホワイトハウスがコントロールする *新しい*ビデオストリーム・
プラットフォームを 考えて
ここを 考えて
これが発生した場合 適切な政府規制(コントロール) を得るために
それぞれを'公益事業'(必須の公共サービス)として分類するための 
即時措置が講じられる
それらを公開するのは なぜ?
Q

This post will be translated asap.

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1097567705933275137
FEAR IS REAL.
Something BIG is coming.
Q

This post will be translated asap.

Anonymous - 2019-02-18 20:10:18 (UTC +1) - 5245512

DAN COATS OUT [FORCED] (SOON) - Source = Trump friend Chris Ruddy.
>>5245512
Interesting this leaked already.
Q

This post will be translated asap.

This post will be translated asap.

Fellow Patriots:
What you are about to learn (learning) should not only scare you, but intensify your resolve to take back control [Freedom]. The information that will become public will further demonstrate the criminal & corrupt [pure evil] abuse of power that the Hussein administration undertook in joint efforts w/ domestic and foreign dignitaries.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXafxCQ
WWG1WGA.
Q

'Q' としてのみ知られている存在(顔の見えない、名前のない、名声のない、など)が
4ch(現在は8ch)で質問をし、どうやってこれだけの規模のものを構築する?
'Q' という存在は、どんなふうに世界中の大手メディア フェイクニュースの注目を集め
攻撃を受け ている?
'Q' という存在が将来の出来事を '予測' したり、大統領がこれからツイートしようとしていることを
'知っている' のはなぜ?
与えられた情報に関して '未来が過去を証明すること' が、なぜ可能なの?
'Q' 、つまり4ちゃん / 8ちゃんで質問するだけで始まった存在は、
どうして.........(←空欄を埋めよ).が可能だったの?
論理的に考えて
人は、真実を切望している
人は、透明性を切望している
人は、法律の下での公平な裁判を切望している
人は、善を切望している
人は、正義を切望している
人は、真の自由を切望している
人は、安全と無事を切望している
人は、...........を切望している(←空欄を埋めよ)
証拠は、嘘/共謀の攻撃に打ち勝つ
攻撃してくるヤツらは、'課題' または '過去最大の偽情報キャンペーン' の
中にハマった状態のままだ
— — — — — — — — — — — -
己に問いかけてみて  なぜ 'ネトウヨ' は、いつも怒っているの?
なぜネトウヨは、汚い言葉で人を罵るの?
なぜネトウヨは、人さまの誹謗中傷をするの(>人種差別主義者、性差別主義者、
...ナントカ主義者など、でっちあげのレッテルを貼って)?
反論されたとき、なぜネトウヨは '感情が爆発' してしまうの?
なぜネトウヨは、暴力的なの?
なぜネトウヨは、暴徒化する(群れる)の?
なぜネトウヨは、反対意見を聞くことができないの(ファシスト)?
自分の主張を支持する事実が存在しない場合(現時点での論理的な理由づけ)、
上記の戦術に頼らざるを得ない
ヤツらの言説は 人を一定の '恐怖' 状態に保ち、それによって
'怒り' 、'激怒'、'暴力' を強いるようにつくられている
精神的に不安定な人は、コントロールしやすい
ヤツらは、僕らの分断を望んでいる
人種による分断
階級による分断
宗教による分断
政治的思想による分断
人間としての分断
分断されれば、弱くなる
団結すれば、強くなる
強くなれば、自分で考えるようになる
強くなれば、'信じろ' と押し付けられたことに刃向かうことができる
強くなれば、覚醒する
強くなれば、誰にもコントローるされることはない
……………………
自分自身を信じて
自分が独りじゃないと信じて
善人が 君のすぐ側で、正義のために闘っていると信じて
君ら全てに神の祝福を
我ら一丸となり、共に進まん
Q

This post will be translated asap.

Anonymous - 2019-02-18 18:53:06 (UTC +1) - 5244054

James Woods @RealJamesWoods

If these actions were directed against a sitting Democrat president, this would be a Watergate level story in the national media by now. Was there an attempt by an acting DAG to weaponize the DOJ in a presidential coup d’etàt?
>>5244054
Attempt to isolate @ FBI/DOJ?
Do you believe the FBI/DOJ acted alone?
If HRC directed & financed the 'dossier' in order to obtain the 'bulk' so-called evidence in order to generate circular news articles (think Yahoo!) and obtain a FISC sign-off, is it reasonable to think that members of the INTEL APPARATUS, STATE DEPT, WH, FOREIGN ALLIES, ETC. were also involved?
THE BIGGEST SCANDAL IN OUR KNOWN HISTORY [A NEW WORD FOR 'TREASON' WILL NEED TO BE INVENTED].
Why does HUSSEIN continue to 'proudly' state his administration was 'scandal free'?
Define 'Projection'.
Q

This post will be translated asap.

https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1097488256848007173
The President of the United States, the Commander in Chief, AGREED that an illegal coup was attempted against him.
Stop and understand the GRAVITY of acknowledgement.
Do you believe nothing will happen?
Do you believe no one will be prosecuted?
POTUS making statements for no reason?
How do you introduce the TRUTH to those still asleep?
DECLAS coming?
The message must be direct (bypass the non reporting of the TRUTH (facts) by FAKE ‘spin the narrative’ NEWS).
Q

This post will be translated asap.

Anonymous - 2019-02-18 17:16:09 (UTC +1) - 5242466

Repost [lb]
Bread 6698
>>5242333
>>5242227 [Q]
>https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/02/18/cbss-lara-logan-on-media-bias-unless-you-seek-out-breitbart-you-wont-see-the-other-side/
>It takes courage to speak the TRUTH these days.
CBS’s Lara Logan on Media Bias: ‘Unless You Seek out Breitbart,’ You Won’t See the ‘Other Side’
www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/02/18/cbss-lara-logan-on-media-bias-unless-you-seek-out-breitbart-you-wont-see-the-other-side/
>>5242466
Read between the lines re: MSM ‘LEFT’….
Research for yourself.
Trust yourself.
No one ‘news’ location will provide unbiased content.
#WakeUp
#FactsMatter
You are the news now.
Q

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/feb/18/online-conspiracy-theorists-democracy
恐怖ってどんな形?
こんなに "検閲" されてるっていうのに、3千万人もの人々が
"Qanon" についてSNSで語り合っている
いや、もっと多くの人々が
大覚醒の時が来た
WWG1WGA!!! (我ら一丸となり、共に進まん)
Q

This post will be translated asap.

[Example CA]
https://calmatters.org/articles/commentary/gavin-newsoms-keeping-it-all-in-the-family/amp/?
What ‘family’ runs CA?
They are all connected.
Wealth-Power-Influence
[RIGGED]
The More You Know….
Q

This post will be translated asap.

https://twitter.com/Courtiah22/status/1097377236771053568
Impressive, most impressive.
Q

This post will be translated asap.

Anonymous - 2019-02-18 07:00:22 (UTC +1) - 5237651

Classic deflection - "the dog ate my homework". Evidence of crime is what you need mr FBI, not dislike and bias to open an investigation.

"Former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe says President Trump's own words were among the reasons top officials decided to open a counterintelligence probe and obstruction of justice investigation into him"



https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1097343765390475265
>>5237651
Dead cat bounce.
Nothing can stop this.
Q

This post will be translated asap.

https://twitter.com/iHeartPOTUS/status/1097372254441226240
Excellent graphic - seconds matter!
Mathematically impossible.
(17th)
Q

This post will be translated asap.

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI - 2019-02-18 04:02:02 (UTC +1) - 5234560

Barr to Mueller:
“Bob, show me the evidence and reasoning for why this investigation was started and still ongoing.”
Mueller to Bart:
“With regards to the President we have found no links or ties to any foreign entity etc”
Barr to Mueller:
“Mandate was clear - verify and investigate reports of possible foreign collusion between President & Russia.” “What justification existed to effectively launch a massive domestic / foreign surv campaign against the President (pres elect / president) and members of his transition / campaign team?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Steele dossier along w/ media corroboration of those findings.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was the Steele report a ‘trusted and verified’ report per Intel to continue especially considering the funding party was the opposition party?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Those facts were never taken into consideration.” “FISC granted auth to conduct based on conclusions presented.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was FISC made aware of all details surrounding the dossier?”
Mueller to Barr:
“No.” “We believe there was urgency placed on the auth given the gravity and timeline of events that those involved negated to populate fully.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Why were efforts made to continue investigating the President, interrupt his official capacity in governing, if the only doc presented was unsubstantiated and unverified?” “Why were questions and threat of subpoena communicated to the President if no factual foundation existed?”
“All charges thus far are unrelated to the original mandate - why are you still active and pursuing a crime if no verifiable evidence or evidence through discovery exists?”
Barr to RR:
“What justification did you have to effectively expand the mandate, not report that expansion to Congress, in order to seek a crime outside of R collusion?” “What specific reasoning and/or facts existed to justify the appointment of a SC to begin with per the law?” “Why did you recommend to Sessions that he should recuse?” “Why wasn’t the mandate / budget and regular updates provided to Congress upon request?” “Why is everything kept confidential and under inappropriate classification?” “Was the purpose of investigating to find a crime vs investigate evidence of a crime?”
CLAS 1-99
Q
>>5234560
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1097350271188062208
Do you believe in coincidences?
Kitchen is HOT.
Q

This post will be translated asap.

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI - 2019-02-18 04:02:02 (UTC +1) - 5234560

Barr to Mueller:
“Bob, show me the evidence and reasoning for why this investigation was started and still ongoing.”
Mueller to Bart:
“With regards to the President we have found no links or ties to any foreign entity etc”
Barr to Mueller:
“Mandate was clear - verify and investigate reports of possible foreign collusion between President & Russia.” “What justification existed to effectively launch a massive domestic / foreign surv campaign against the President (pres elect / president) and members of his transition / campaign team?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Steele dossier along w/ media corroboration of those findings.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was the Steele report a ‘trusted and verified’ report per Intel to continue especially considering the funding party was the opposition party?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Those facts were never taken into consideration.” “FISC granted auth to conduct based on conclusions presented.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was FISC made aware of all details surrounding the dossier?”
Mueller to Barr:
“No.” “We believe there was urgency placed on the auth given the gravity and timeline of events that those involved negated to populate fully.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Why were efforts made to continue investigating the President, interrupt his official capacity in governing, if the only doc presented was unsubstantiated and unverified?” “Why were questions and threat of subpoena communicated to the President if no factual foundation existed?”
“All charges thus far are unrelated to the original mandate - why are you still active and pursuing a crime if no verifiable evidence or evidence through discovery exists?”
Barr to RR:
“What justification did you have to effectively expand the mandate, not report that expansion to Congress, in order to seek a crime outside of R collusion?” “What specific reasoning and/or facts existed to justify the appointment of a SC to begin with per the law?” “Why did you recommend to Sessions that he should recuse?” “Why wasn’t the mandate / budget and regular updates provided to Congress upon request?” “Why is everything kept confidential and under inappropriate classification?” “Was the purpose of investigating to find a crime vs investigate evidence of a crime?”
CLAS 1-99
Q
>>5234560
Disregard any misspelling.
On the move.
Q

This post will be translated asap.

Barr to Mueller:
“Bob, show me the evidence and reasoning for why this investigation was started and still ongoing.”
Mueller to Bart:
“With regards to the President we have found no links or ties to any foreign entity etc”
Barr to Mueller:
“Mandate was clear - verify and investigate reports of possible foreign collusion between President & Russia.” “What justification existed to effectively launch a massive domestic / foreign surv campaign against the President (pres elect / president) and members of his transition / campaign team?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Steele dossier along w/ media corroboration of those findings.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was the Steele report a ‘trusted and verified’ report per Intel to continue especially considering the funding party was the opposition party?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Those facts were never taken into consideration.” “FISC granted auth to conduct based on conclusions presented.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was FISC made aware of all details surrounding the dossier?”
Mueller to Barr:
“No.” “We believe there was urgency placed on the auth given the gravity and timeline of events that those involved negated to populate fully.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Why were efforts made to continue investigating the President, interrupt his official capacity in governing, if the only doc presented was unsubstantiated and unverified?” “Why were questions and threat of subpoena communicated to the President if no factual foundation existed?”
“All charges thus far are unrelated to the original mandate - why are you still active and pursuing a crime if no verifiable evidence or evidence through discovery exists?”
Barr to RR:
“What justification did you have to effectively expand the mandate, not report that expansion to Congress, in order to seek a crime outside of R collusion?” “What specific reasoning and/or facts existed to justify the appointment of a SC to begin with per the law?” “Why did you recommend to Sessions that he should recuse?” “Why wasn’t the mandate / budget and regular updates provided to Congress upon request?” “Why is everything kept confidential and under inappropriate classification?” “Was the purpose of investigating to find a crime vs investigate evidence of a crime?”
CLAS 1-99
Q

Anonymous - 2019-02-18 01:00:43 (UTC +1) - 5231025

3 [0] Deltas today sir
>>5231025
よくやった、愛国者君
"Q"が大統領の直前にドロップすることに、
注目するのが重要だ
大きなことが、まもなく起きる
Q

This post will be translated asap.

Graphic request.
(3) Q/POTUS [0] DELTA
Q

This post will be translated asap.

Anonymous - 2019-02-18 00:45:57 (UTC +1) - 5230665

New POTUS Tweet
[1] minute delta
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1097280840156020736
(est)
>>5230665
(3) today?
What are the odds of that?
Q

This post will be translated asap.

Anonymous - 2019-02-18 00:32:20 (UTC +1) - 5230378

>>5230278
>time.com/5324130/most-influential-internet/
>>5230378
The World is waking up to the TRUTH.
Expect 'attacks' to dramatically intensify across all platforms.
Q

This post will be translated asap.

http://time.com/5324130/most-influential-internet/
They knew the 'reach' then.
Think about now.
Q

This post will be translated asap.

How do you infiltrate the MSM?
[Example 1]
ABC NEWS exec producer Ian Cameron married to Susan Rice (Nat Sec Advisor - HUSSEIN)?
CBS NEWS/CNN Journ Bianna Vitalievna married to Peter R Orszag (Dir of Office of Mgmt/Budget - HUSSEIN)?
CBS NEWS president David Rhodes brother of Ben Rhodes (Del Nat Sec Advisor - HUSSEIN)?
ABC NEWS correspondent Claire Shipman married to Jay Carney (WH Press Sec - HUSSEIN)?
……………
MSM = arm/extension of the [D] party?
Nothing to See Here.
Q

This post will be translated asap.

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI - 2019-02-17 23:04:54 (UTC +1) - 5228903

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cory-booker-withholding-judgment-on-smollett-case-after-calling-it-attempted-modern-day-lynching
Harris & Booker applying political pressure re: Chicago PD re: Smollett FF case?
What Bill did the Senate recently pass re: lynching?
Who were the authors of the Bill?
What FF event took place just prior to the passing of the Bill?
Did the FF event involve a 'noose'?
Did the FF event sway Senators in their decision to prevent FAKE NEWS attacks re: Smollett case?
Did FAKE NEWS contact many Senators prior to vote seeking out pro/nay in attempt to coerce using Smollett case as foundation for possible future smear?
What is the mathematical probability of these [2] events occurring within this same time period?
What is the relationship of Smollett & Booker/Harris?
Will Rahm Emanuel get involved?
Will the Chicago PD cave under pressure?
These people are sick!
#WakeUpAmerica
Q
>>5228903
Irony.
Q

This post will be translated asap.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cory-booker-withholding-judgment-on-smollett-case-after-calling-it-attempted-modern-day-lynching
Harris & Booker applying political pressure re: Chicago PD re: Smollett FF case?
What Bill did the Senate recently pass re: lynching?
Who were the authors of the Bill?
What FF event took place just prior to the passing of the Bill?
Did the FF event involve a 'noose'?
Did the FF event sway Senators in their decision to prevent FAKE NEWS attacks re: Smollett case?
Did FAKE NEWS contact many Senators prior to vote seeking out pro/nay in attempt to coerce using Smollett case as foundation for possible future smear?
What is the mathematical probability of these [2] events occurring within this same time period?
What is the relationship of Smollett & Booker/Harris?
Will Rahm Emanuel get involved?
Will the Chicago PD cave under pressure?
These people are sick!
#WakeUpAmerica
Q

This post will be translated asap.

@Snowden
What happens when Russia gives you up?
Will the C_A protect you?
Sleep is important.
Q

This post will be translated asap.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/02/15/whitaker-justice-department-attorney-general-counselor-1172109
WHITAKER remain DOJ senior staff?
Senior counselor in the associate attorney general’s office?
Planned?
Q

This post will be translated asap.

Anonymous - 2019-02-17 20:06:48 (UTC +1) - 5225833

Rocking gif overlay
>>5225833
Great work, Patriot.
Slowing will further highlight.
Q

This post will be translated asap.

Anonymous - 2019-02-17 19:56:11 (UTC +1) - 5225562

>>5225486
Good stuff
>>5225562

This post will be translated asap.

Anonymous - 2019-02-17 19:51:51 (UTC +1) - 5225482

2 Q posts

2 POTUS tweets

All within a one minute delta
>>5225482
Think about why separated both maps (2 posts) instead of placing both in the orig.
At what point is it mathematically impossible?
Q

This post will be translated asap.

Anonymous - 2019-02-17 19:47:11 (UTC +1) - 5225342

>>5225131
>>5224931
>>5224934
>>5225094
>>5225232
[0] Delta from today, and the last [0] delta.
16 total now!
>>5225342
Thank you, Patriot.
Q

This post will be translated asap.

Anonymous - 2019-02-17 19:44:39 (UTC +1) - 5225271

>>5225213
>>5225271
You are the news now.
Q

This post will be translated asap.

Anonymous - 2019-02-17 19:39:41 (UTC +1) - 5225131

>>5224934
>>5224931
2 [0] Deltas guys 2
>>5225131
Q+

This post will be translated asap.

Anonymous - 2019-02-17 19:38:25 (UTC +1) - 5225105

Yet another blattant Q proof:

DOUBLE ZERO DELTA

Trump team is with us today friends!
>>5225105
We love our Memes, don't we folks?
Q+

This post will be translated asap.

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI - 2019-02-17 19:38:05 (UTC +1) - 5225094

>>5224943
Date posted (early)?
Oct 31 2017
Prior to the black pop awakening?
Why did we emphasize as important?
When you are awake we can see clearly.
Q
>>5225094
Swap 'we' for 'you'.
On the move.
Q

Anonymous - 2019-02-17 19:29:31 (UTC +1) - 5224943

>>5224931
black pop waking up?
>>5224943
ポストされた日付 (早い) ?
2017年10月31日
アフリカ系アメリカ人の覚醒の前に?
なんで重要だと強調したのかわかる?
覚醒しているなら、ハッキリとわかるよね
Q

This post will be translated asap.

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI - 2019-02-17 19:28:46 (UTC +1) - 5224931

https://twitter.com/THawk23055136/status/1097194764250673152
It's very simple - w/o the illegal vote D's lose.
Previous illegal imm high pop v D win by county provided.
[Example 2]
Why do D's push for illegals to obtain a driver's license?
Does having a DL make it easier to vote?
http://www.ncsl.org/research/immigration/states-offering-driver-s-licenses-to-immigrants.aspx
What states provide DL's to illegals?
What checks are in place within each of the 'DL granted states' to prevent 2x-3x-4x-5x voting?
Compare v. 2016 Presidential election results.
What do you notice?
Do you believe in coincidences?
Memes are important.
#FactsMatter
Q
>>5224931

This post will be translated asap.

https://twitter.com/THawk23055136/status/1097194764250673152
It's very simple - w/o the illegal vote D's lose.
Previous illegal imm high pop v D win by county provided.
[Example 2]
Why do D's push for illegals to obtain a driver's license?
Does having a DL make it easier to vote?
http://www.ncsl.org/research/immigration/states-offering-driver-s-licenses-to-immigrants.aspx
What states provide DL's to illegals?
What checks are in place within each of the 'DL granted states' to prevent 2x-3x-4x-5x voting?
Compare v. 2016 Presidential election results.
What do you notice?
Do you believe in coincidences?
Memes are important.
#FactsMatter
Q